AI Recruiting Compliance: Navigating NYC Law 144 and Beyond

As artificial intelligence permeates the hiring landscape, regulators are stepping in to ensure that these powerful algorithms do not perpetuate historical biases.

The most prominent of these regulations is New York City Local Law 144 (NYC 144), which went into effect regulating the use of Automated Employment Decision Tools (AEDT). Following NYC's lead, the European Union's AI Act and various state-level legislations in California and Illinois have created a complex web of compliance for HR teams.

If your company uses AI to source, screen, or interview candidates, ignoring compliance is no longer an option. Here is what you need to know to stay legal and ethical in 2026.

What is an Automated Employment Decision Tool (AEDT)?

Under NYC 144, an AEDT is broadly defined as any computational process that uses machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics, or artificial intelligence to substantially assist or replace discretionary decision-making for employment decisions.

If your software parses resumes and assigns a "score" that determines who gets an interview, you are using an AEDT.

Core Requirements of NYC Law 144

If you are hiring candidates residing in New York City, you must adhere to three main pillars:

1. Independent Bias Auditing

Before using an AI tool, it must undergo a bias audit conducted by an independent third party. This auditor must calculate the selection rates and impact ratios across different demographic categories (sex/gender, race/ethnicity) to ensure the AI does not exhibit disparate impact.

2. Public Transparency

The results of this bias audit—including the exact metrics and impact ratios—must be publicly posted on the employer's website. Hiding the algorithm in a "black box" is strictly prohibited.

3. Candidate Notification

Candidates must be notified before the AEDT is used. They must be informed that AI will be evaluating their application and be given the opportunity to request an alternative accommodation or evaluation process.

The Global Ripple Effect

NYC 144 was just the beginning.

• The EU AI Act: Classifies AI recruitment software as "High Risk," imposing stringent requirements on data quality, human oversight, and risk management systems.
• Illinois AI Video Interview Act: Requires explicit consent before analyzing a candidate's video interview using AI.

How to Choose a Compliant AI Platform

The burden of compliance falls on the employer, not just the software vendor. However, choosing the right vendor makes compliance infinitely easier.

When evaluating AI recruiting platforms, ask these questions:

1. Do they provide recent independent audit reports? A vendor should hand you their latest bias audit to publish on your site.
2. Do they offer "Blind" Screening? Platforms like MyRecruitmentAgency allow you to automatically strip names, universities, and demographic indicators from resumes before the AI scores them, inherently reducing bias risk.
3. Is there an Opt-Out Workflow? The software should automatically handle candidate notifications and alternative routing if they opt out of AI screening.

Conclusion

AI recruiting compliance doesn't have to be a roadblock to innovation. By partnering with transparent, compliance-first technology vendors, your HR team can leverage the massive efficiency gains of AI while remaining firmly on the right side of the law.

---

Ready to get started? • Register as an Employer — Post roles and let AI find your perfect candidates. • Register as a Candidate — Get matched to jobs that fit your skills.